the Chinese clamming What'
an
3) The possibility of the "leased terminis" of Hong Kong by the reaction of extratimitinal rights.
These Chintans
leas
by
were transferred
4
the Convention of Peking (9/6/1898).
The convention is not explent
Sovereignty the leand
of the
Great
Wh
arla
covered
99 year's
on to whether
full Do the Jr spentes
also Transfered.
Com
"British Territory of
Butam having sok jurischestun
at is w
except for the Chimère officects exoeing clubed jurisdiction in
Kowloon city. ( a walled vellege now absorbed in the newly developed Korswoon)
The Chinese extention according to Sir John Brenan
would be that
Sovereignity and
a lease did not transfer
в
thank there fore
Therefore there distancing between British holding of
and es.
Что
the consensin at Carlin!
is
19
no that
The New Tentonés
a pon't which will
новор
Cins
out in
for
an agreement
is a tum
the "bargaining" largely depender
reganda
HK as
a
and
deansing for en porture posting a
a white (me 55104/42). It would
certainly be immortal to
who-
that the consi
New Territories and oppose be at the
ready
t
give up Hangkas entirely.
янк
hand the possession of
would be virtually impossible.
Jame time
On the Sher
work out the New Kentoin
Sir John Brenan tells
he
That the US,
wice Iveret their chrapt to the Clues tomow at Washington. We cannot act wit
the comments
have
and so
Are Autralia & S.
8. Cupca a drift
wone be
permble
will tell the Chinese that a
submitted then at Chungking in the lives
mobably
of
ann nou in
the US. drags.
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.